Churches Faith Builders Email Updates Biz Directory Commerce
Clones and Cloning

Is Cloning Biblical?

Sheep (FP)How do you answer a question that Scripture never specifically asks? Just as it was beyond the imagination of biblical writers to address birth-control pills, artificial insemination, Living Wills, so Scripture never addresses cloning as a specific topic. The reason, of course, is that such medical technology was not available then. But how do we answer such ethical questions with Scripture? If there is no "Thou shalt not clone" in Scripture, how do we assess the moral quandry of whether or not to clone? Three questions might be helpful.

First, what is the intent or motive for cloning? Does the intent serve God's redemptive purposes in the world or does it promote sinful human desires?

Second, what are the consequences of cloning? Will cloning promote the values of God's kingdom in the world or will it destroy what God is seeking to promote?

Third, what theological value is violated by cloning? Or, is there a theological value that sanctions it? What is God's intent for procreation/reproduction? Would cloning serve that divine intent or undermine it?

These three questions provide a methodology for addressing ethical questions. Every ethical act will (1) arise out of a good intent, (2) promote the values of the kingdom, and (3) serve God's intent for his creation. But only Scripture can authoritatively describe good intentions, kingdom values and God's intent. Once we understand what God's agenda and intent are, then we may apply those principles to any ethical question, including cloning.

Here Come the....Clones?

We now live in a post-Dolly world where human cloning is no longer science fiction but a genuine possibility, and probably a future reality. A clone would be like a delayed identical twin. The clone and its "parent" would have identical genetic material, but they would differ in much the same way that identical twins differ in personality, interests and even physical characteristics due to environment, nurture and personal development. Clones would not be carbon copies, but new and different personal expressions of their "parent's" DNA material. Thus, clones would be people too.

Unfortunately, whatever humanity can do, it thinks it must do. Cloning will be no different. One day someone, somewhere will clone a human, but we should think about its ethical implications before we applaud it.

Why clone a human? It might serve as an alternative reproductive technology. Yet, for the foreseeable future in vitro fertilization (IVF) would serve as a less costly and more successful option for infertile couples. IVF now has a 10-20% success rate whereas Dolly was 1 of 277. Even if the parents have damaged genetic material, they might seek sperm and/or egg donors rather than cloning. Perhaps cloning might help combat genetic diseases--a laudable goal. But cloning simply replicates what is there; it does not fix damaged genetic material. Gene therapy has that redemptive potential, but not cloning.

So, why clone? The opportunity for narcissistic self-expression is overwhelming. Cloning might not so much serve the interest of the child as it would play to the ego of the one whose genetic material is replicated. It might serve our fallen desire to be our own creators.

The consequences of cloning might involve the devaluation of the nature of human reproduction. Children might become products rather than gifts; parenthood would become mechanistic replication rather than the union of two persons who together create a new genetic identity. We must think carefully about what cloning would symbolize about parenting, children and procreation. Would cloning demystify procreation, mechanize the process and undermine God's intent to fill the earth through heterosexual reproduction? In short, what kind of community would cloning produce?

Unlike identical twins, cloning would not involve the creation of a new genetic identity. Lacking the integration of two genetic identities--an egg and sperm--into a newly created one, it replicates rather than creates. The creative act, however, grounds our human dignity and individuality before God. Although its ultimate effect is the production of a human being, cloning predetermines what should probably remain open to the mystery of God's work in procreation.

One day we may meet a clone, or our grandchildren will. They would not be primarily "clones," however, but persons, and due the respect that all persons are owed. Whether we applaud the act or not, we should love the person.

Brief Bibliography

Bohlin, Raymond G and Lane P. Lester; with a response by V. Elving Anderson.
The Natural Limits of Biological Change. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984.

Brown, R. Geoffrey, "Clones, Chimeras, and the Image of God: Lessons from Bartian Bioethics," 238-49. In Bioethics and the Future of Medicine: A Christian Apprasial, edited by Nigel M. de S. Cameron, et. al. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.

Chadwick, Ruth F., "Cloning," Philosophy 57 (April 1982), 201-10.

Cole-Turner, Ronald. The New Genesis: Theology and the Genetic Revolution. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1993.

Eisenberg, Leon, "The Outcome as Cause: Predestination and Human Cloning," Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (December 1976), 318-31.

Feinberg, John S. and Paul D. Feinberg. Ethics for a Brave New World. Wheaton: Crossway Books, 1993.

Hubbard, Ruth and Elijah Ward. Exploding the Gene Myth: How Genetic Information is Produced and Manipulated by Scientists, Physicians, Employers, Insurance Companies, Educators, and Law Enforcers. Boston : Beacon Press, 1993.

LaBar, Martin, "The Pros and Cons of Human Cloning," Thought 59 (1984), 319-33.

McGee, Glenn. The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1997.

Meyer, John R., "Cloning Human Embryos: Why Artificial Human Procreation Is Immoral," Linacre Quarterly 62 (May 1995), 22-29.

Newsweek 10 March 1997.

Peters, Ted. Playing God? Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom. New York: Routledge, 1996.

Rae, Scott B. Brave New Families: Biblical Ethics and Reproductive Technologies. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996.

Roberts, Melinda A., "Human Cloning: A Case of No Harm Done?," Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (October 1996), 537-54.

Robertson, John A., "The Question of Human Cloning," Hastings Center Report 24 (March-April 1994), 6-14.

Time Magazine 10 March 1997.

Time Magazine 8 November 1993, 65-70.

Verhey, Allen D., "Cloning: Revisiting An Old Debate," Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4 (September 1994), 227-34.

A version of this article first appeared in Christian Chronicle 54 (May 1997), 16.



Bible Search

Add Bible to your site

Oct 2018
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Site-specific content Copyright (c) 2000 or Used by Permission
All other content Copyright (c) 2000 FaithSites, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy.

If you are offended by anything on this page, click here.